#240
Mar 09, 2026
“How are you?”
“Good.”
“How’s business?”
“Good.”
“What’s challenging you at the moment?”
“Good.”
It was out before he realised.
Autopilot.
Perhaps the most socially accepted lie in modern interaction.
Good means:
- Don’t probe
- Don’t complicate this
- I’ve got it handled
- I don’t have it handled but I’m not ready to say that
- My problems are my burden
Good is efficient.
It’s also anaesthetic.
The leader I’m referring to above described his team, his growth opportunities, his health and his stress levels as “good.”
Until one question slipped past the armour.
Later he admitted, “I haven’t actually stopped to feel any of it.”
That’s the cost.
Good keeps everything functioning.
It also keeps everything unexamined.
> You can be good in a role that’s quietly draining you.
> Good in a relationship that’s thinning.
> Good in a body that’s whispering before it shouts.
Good keeps you respectable.
Controlled.
Dependable.
But it rarely makes you honest.
And here’s the sharper edge:
If you weren’t allowed to say good, what would you have to confront
Because beneath good there is often:
- Fatigue
- Resentment
- Fear of disruption
Good protects image.
Truth risks vulnerability.
Three questions worth sitting with:
> Where are you defaulting to “good” instead of being specific?
> What would feel slightly more true than good?
> What are you avoiding by keeping everything acceptable?
You don’t need to collapse.
You don’t need to overshare.
But perhaps instead of “good,” you try:
- “I’m steady but stretched.”
- “I’m functioning but not fulfilled.”
- “I’m coping, but something needs attention.”
Avoidance feels stable.
But here’s the provocation:
Good is often the first sign something isn’t.
If you keep saying good, nothing changes.
If you let the truth in even slightly something has to.
Or at least a seed continues to grow.
Which would you prefer?